Cop Block reader D. Thompson reports that he was approached by an Agent Schmidt (badge #1014) of the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s office while he was in a doctor’s office. Agent Schmidt told Mr. Thompson that he was investigating some sort of red flag in the state’s prescription drug monitoring system, and that apparently he’d visited the physicians of record, and had already swindled (or blackmailed?) them into disclosing what Mr. Thompson would think should be HIPAA-protected health records. Mr. Thompson doubts any warrant was issued for obtaining any records.
Agent Schmidt then purportedly offered to take a cash payment in exchange for telling his office that there was nothing to investigate and to (supposedly) make the case go away. Mr. Thompson advised the agent that he had no interest in paying him cash in exchange for his “service.” Schmidt then told Thompson that he was “an asshole” and that Thompson would be prosecuted for obtaining prescription medications from two providers at the same physician’s office.
In a time where the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world, mostly over drugs, this is disturbing to say the least. There have already been numerous crackdowns on medical marijuana patients and dispensaries. People continue to have their lives senselessly inconvenienced or destroyed over the war on drugs, and now the police are seeking to crack down even on legal drugs.
The intrusion, or even worse, mutual partnership, of law enforcement with healthcare is utterly atrocious. This is not only a moral abomination – the entanglement of government officials, bureaucracy, and violent enforcement, with that of private medical decisions and healthcare essentially amounts to fascism. The reality is that although HIPAA purports to protect patient “privacy,” and warrants are “required” for certain investigations, there are various systems currently in place that record and compile data regarding people’s prescription medications, so that when certain parameters are met, or “red flags” are triggered such as in this case, law enforcement can either crack down on physicians, or their patients. The DEA and various federal enforcement agencies pressure, or even force physicians to monitor, and essentially criminalize their own patients.
Drug addicts are jailed instead of rehabilitated. Women have had their children seized for eating poppy seed bagels and refusing certain surgical procedures. William Reddie was shot and killedover an incident wherein CPS tried to take his son away over a marijuana incident.
Anna and Alex Nikolayev of California recently had their infant seized by Child Protective Services, purportedly because they sought to obtain a second medical opinion on their son’s condition. The police showed up at their door and smacked Mr. Nikolayev to the ground. Mr. Nikolayev is originally from Russia, and noted that the ridiculous situation reminded him of a “communist regime.”
Such drastic and violent measures cannot even remotely be said to be in furtherance of anyone’s safety. Having no mother is not safer, or better for a child than having a mother who eats poppy seed bagels. Having no mother is not safer, or better, than having a mother who does not wish to preemptively consent to unnecessary medical procedures. Having a dead father is not safer, or better than having a father who smokes pot occasionally. Having no parents is not better than having parents who (god forbid) are frustrated with the level of care being provided, and wish to seek a second medical opinion.
After Officer Pedro Serrano decided to testify in federal court about what he sees as wrongdoing within the New York Police Department, a rat sticker appeared on his locker.
That was the least of his problems.
Serrano claims he’s been harassed, micromanaged and eventually transferred to a different precinct and put on the overnight shift.
“It hasn’t been a picnic,” he said in an interview this week. “They have their methods of dealing with someone like me.”
Serrano and other whistle-blowers took the stand in a civil rights case challenging some of the 5 million streets stops made by police in the past decade using a tactic known as stop and frisk. They believe illegal quotas are behind some wrongful stops of black and Hispanic men.
“A lot of people told me not to come forward because of what would happen — they said the department would come after me,” Serrano said. “But I’ve been thinking about it since 2007. I felt I couldn’t keep quiet.”
“It’s none of your business what I’m doing on your property.”
Thank you for protecting us from those weed smokers.
Members of Congress who voted for CISPA last week have received threats of violence and had their phone numbers, addresses and other personal details posted online by those who disagree with the legislation. The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act would allow private companies to share cybersecurity information with the federal government, sparking privacy concerns and causing some to dub it the “Big Brother Law.”
Whispers has learned that the office of at least one member of Congress has asked the FBI to investigate.
A Twitter user called “Grim Reaper,” for example, whose bio reads: “We kill the ones that are corrupt so you don’t have to,” has been harassing Rep. Mike Pompeo, R-Kan., who cosponsored CISPA.
“For your support of CISPA Rep. Mike Pompeo, the bill to end privacy, here is your dox,” wrote Grim Reaper, and then shared a document including the congressman’s work address and phone number, military service and salary, and even his zodiac sign. The document was posted to Pastebin, a website favored by hackers like Anonymous.
“Doxing” is the practice of posting personal information, much of which is already available online, all in one place in an effort to destroy anonymity. Another user threatened to add Pompeo’s credit card and social security numbers.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., the author of the CISPA legislation, has also been threatened. A “dox” about Rogers, also posted on Pastebin, includes the names of his wife and children, his work addresses, and a link to a petition for his removal from Congress.
A third document posted to Pastebin includes the phone numbers of every member of Congress who voted for CISPA.
Rogers has defended CISPA as “a constitutional obligation to defend this nation,” while Pompeo has called it “a Good Samaritan law for cyberspace.”
To his online aggressors, the Kansas congressman responded on Twitter: “Really?”
A spokesman for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence says that Rogers, who chairs the committee, is “far more focused on the real threat of cyber espionage from countries like China than he is on faceless and anonymous threats online.”