How to refuse showing I.D. during police harassment


That is how you do it. You see, they ASK you for your ID. There’s a difference between asking and demanding. Any cop is welcome to ask for your ID, but keep in mind you are not obligated to provide him with identification unless he’s detaining you. In order to detain you, he must have “articulable facts that would indicate to a reasonable person that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed”. He needs these facts to force you to present ID. Without them, you are free to resist.

Biometric Database of All Adult Americans Hidden in Immigration Reform
The immigration reform measure the Senate began debating yesterday would create a national biometric database of virtually every adult in the U.S., in what privacy groups fear could be the first step to a ubiquitous national identification system.
Buried in the more than 800 pages of the bipartisan legislation (.pdf)  is language mandating the creation of the innocuously-named “photo tool,” a massive federal database administered by the Department of Homeland Security and containing names, ages, Social Security numbers and photographs of everyone in the country with a driver’s license or other state-issued photo ID.
Employers would be obliged to look up every new hire in the database to verify that they match their photo.
This piece of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act is aimed at curbing employment of undocumented immigrants. But privacy advocates fear the inevitable mission creep, ending with the proof of self being required at polling places, to rent a house, buy a gun, open a bank account, acquire credit, board a plane or even attend a sporting event or log on the internet. Think of it as a government version of Foursquare, with Big Brother cataloging every check-in.
“It starts to change the relationship between the citizen and state, you do have to get permission to do things,” said Chris Calabrese, a congressional lobbyist with the American Civil Liberties Union. “More fundamentally, it could be the start of keeping a record of all things.”
For now, the legislation allows the database to be used solely for employment purposes. But historically such limitations don’t last. The Social Security card, for example, was created to track your government retirement benefits. Now you need it to purchase health insurance.
“The Social Security number itself, it’s pretty ubiquitous in your life,” Calabrese said.
David Bier, an analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, agrees with the ACLU’s fears.
“The most worrying aspect is that this creates a principle of permission basically to do certain activities and it can be used to restrict activities,” he said. “It’s like a national ID system without the card.”
For the moment, the debate in the Senate Judiciary Committee is focused on the parameters of legalization for unauthorized immigrants, a border fence and legal immigration in the future.
The committee is scheduled to resume debate on the package Tuesday.

Biometric Database of All Adult Americans Hidden in Immigration Reform

The immigration reform measure the Senate began debating yesterday would create a national biometric database of virtually every adult in the U.S., in what privacy groups fear could be the first step to a ubiquitous national identification system.

Buried in the more than 800 pages of the bipartisan legislation (.pdf)  is language mandating the creation of the innocuously-named “photo tool,” a massive federal database administered by the Department of Homeland Security and containing names, ages, Social Security numbers and photographs of everyone in the country with a driver’s license or other state-issued photo ID.

Employers would be obliged to look up every new hire in the database to verify that they match their photo.

This piece of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act is aimed at curbing employment of undocumented immigrants. But privacy advocates fear the inevitable mission creep, ending with the proof of self being required at polling places, to rent a house, buy a gun, open a bank account, acquire credit, board a plane or even attend a sporting event or log on the internet. Think of it as a government version of Foursquare, with Big Brother cataloging every check-in.

“It starts to change the relationship between the citizen and state, you do have to get permission to do things,” said Chris Calabrese, a congressional lobbyist with the American Civil Liberties Union. “More fundamentally, it could be the start of keeping a record of all things.”

For now, the legislation allows the database to be used solely for employment purposes. But historically such limitations don’t last. The Social Security card, for example, was created to track your government retirement benefits. Now you need it to purchase health insurance.

“The Social Security number itself, it’s pretty ubiquitous in your life,” Calabrese said.

David Bier, an analyst with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, agrees with the ACLU’s fears.

“The most worrying aspect is that this creates a principle of permission basically to do certain activities and it can be used to restrict activities,” he said. “It’s like a national ID system without the card.”

For the moment, the debate in the Senate Judiciary Committee is focused on the parameters of legalization for unauthorized immigrants, a border fence and legal immigration in the future.

The committee is scheduled to resume debate on the package Tuesday.

Rights flexed

If you are walking down the street, minding your own business, and a police officer stops you and asks for your I.D., tells you to move along, or to turn your video camera off, would you know your constitutional rights?

This video is a collage of clips from other individual’s videos (links below) and I thank them for having the courage to defend our rights and for creating these videos to educate the public and government officials of our constitutional rights, my hat is off to them. Please check out their videos and channels and subscribe.


Eugene, Oregon - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7UMdniHWkI

Santa Fe, New Mexico - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXwP02Dkp7A&feature=related

Austin, Texas - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdNO10dNqKA&feature=related

Bensalem, Pennsylvania - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmNU7Zmbe0s

Concord, New Hampshire - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GWhR-FE64

Cumberland County - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njb6X-nmW2M

Unknown Location - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0En_sdsyh1M

Portland Oregon - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwSv2jHZ5pU

You might be saying, “what’s the big deal, just turn the camera off, put the gun away and show the officer your papers.” It is a very big deal as “A Right Unexercised is a Right Lost,” just as Nazi Germany found out when it was too late. If we give up a few rights today, and a few more tomorrow, how long will it take before we have no rights left?

Some might also say, “You’re just causing a problem by refusing to comply with the officer.” Who is the troublemaker in these situations? The law abiding citizen or the officer who lies and tells you, “turn off your camera or I’ll take you to jail?”

back to top